WAS
CARGILL
Cargill Empyreal75
REEF
ISFNF
ISFNF
ISFNF
ISFNF
GLOBAL LEADERS
Why growing bacteria up pond side without professional oversight may be a biosecurity nightmare?

Why growing bacteria up pond side without professional oversight may be a biosecurity nightmare?

WAS
CARGILL
Cargill Empyreal75
REEF
ISFNF
ISFNF
ISFNF
ISFNF
GLOBAL LEADERS

Visitas: 105

By: Ph.D. Stephen G. Newman*

Perhaps the single largest biosecurity gap, right after not ensuring that broodstock are clean, in dealing with AHPNS is the continued pond side growthout of bacteria without appropriate quality control and oversight. This poses a serious biosecurity risk: AHPNS causing bacteria thrive under these conditions.

Perhaps the single largest biosecurity gap, right after not ensuring that broodstock are clean, in dealing with AHPNS is the continued pond side growthout of bacteria without appropriate quality control and oversight. This poses a serious biosecurity risk: AHPNS causing bacteria thrive under these conditions.

Please note that I am not saying that the products are being activated are problematic; this I have no way of knowing one way or another. We sell products that are used in this way as well. What I am saying is that without appropriate oversight, there is a strong possibility of contamination of these tanks with vibrios and quite possibly the vibrios that cause AHPNS.

This makes this practice a serious biosecurity risk. There are products that avoid this, such as the tableted blend of Bacillus species, PRO4000X which is wide used in Ecuador and other countries.

Why growing bacteria up pond side without professional oversight may be a biosecurity nightmare?

Vibrios are ubiquitous in aquatic environments. They serve an important role in degrading chitin. Most are benign, although they can infect weakened animals. Only a few are associated with disease as an obligate pathogens, i.e., they infect and affect healthy animals.

The vibrios that are of greatest concern globally are those that cause AHPNS. This is a toxicosis in that the presence of the PirA and PirB toxins are responsible for this syndrome. This has stimulated a great deal of interest among a wide range of researchers.

The genes that encode for the production of these toxins are located on a plasmid (pVA1), a small circular piece of DNA that is extrachromosomal.

“Plasmids can carry many different genes including, among many others, those for antibiotic resistance, outer membrane proteins and a variety of the toxins.”

These particular plasmids and parts of them are readily transferred between different strains and species. We are only just beginning to learn how widespread it is. Originally found in a strain of Vibrio parahaemolyticus (VP) in China, it has since been found in various strains in culture collections that predate the Chinese reports.

It has also been found in a number of other vibrios and other species of bacteria. It is not unreasonable to expect that this trend will continue as long as cultural practices encourage it.

Among the many findings is that there are variable quantities of plasmids within different strains. It is important to understand that the process by which these genes move between bacteria is not highly efficient and pieces of the genes, genes that encode for only one of the toxins and many variations thereof will occur.

Why growing bacteria up pond side without professional oversight may be a biosecurity nightmare?

Some strains will have many copies of the plasmid and not produce much toxin, while others may produce high levels of toxins. Some may produce both toxins while others may only produce one or the other. These toxins are responsible for the pathology, although recent data suggests that some of the other properties of the bacteria are likely contributing as well.

Studies with cells free, purified toxins have shown that by themselves, i.e., in the absence of the bacteria, these toxins can cause the damage observed on the target organ. Bacteria are ubiquitous in and on shrimp and the environment that they live in. For many, vibrios are thought of as undesirable bacteria.

This has typically focused on those that cannot degrade the sugar sucrose. On the selective media TCBS this property is responsible for the colonies appearing green when they cannot utilize it, and yellow when they can. This is factually incorrect in that there is no correlation between the ability to produce disease and the ability to degrade sucrose.

“Selective elimination of any given bacterial species in the absence of failing to address what are usually the true reasons for many problems in the shrimp, including but not limited to the presence of stressors and the carry-over of pathogens from broodstock into PLs is more than likely not wise.”

Microbiomes are complex and selectively eliminating elements of them may lead to other problems. The widespread use of disinfectants appear to enable the strains that cause AHPNS by eliminating competitive bacteria.

Most vibrios grow very quickly. Their generation times (time to doubling) under the right conditions can be 12 minutes or less. When bacillus spore products are cultured on pond side it can take hours for the spores to germinate with some species and strains being quicker than others although many take 12 or more hours.

Why growing bacteria up pond side without professional oversight may be a biosecurity nightmare?

This is temperature and salinity dependent. The strains of VP responsible for AHPNS have some properties that allow them to readily outgrow and compete against many other bacteria.

The PirA and PirB toxins can be present in the absence of the bacteria. Bacteria can be protected by biofilms and sequestered in areas that further protects them. The use of disinfectants disrupts the microbiome and may actually create a selective advantage for the faster growing bacteria to dominate.

“There is increasing evidence that even low levels of the toxins may damage the HPs.”

This is in turn increases the chances of animal health challenges affecting growth rates, feed conversions and of course profitability. Screening for the presence of the specific bacteria that are producing the toxins are problematic.

One cannot be certain what species are producing the toxins. There are practical limits to how much material can be sampled cost effectively. Using the most sensitive techniques available one can still have false negatives.

For various reasons the limitations that exist in the sampling complex aquatic ecosystems ensure that there will always be some false negatives.

“It is not accurate to state that when samples are negative, and this always means that the environment is tested is free of the toxin.”

Pond side grow out systems allow rapidly growing strains/species such as the vibrios proliferate at the expense of all others. This is why quality control of any activation or grow out scheme that entails growing bacteria on the pond side is essential.

Why growing bacteria up pond side without professional oversight may be a biosecurity nightmare?

For many years farmers have decided that the best way to add beneficial bacteria to their ponds is to grow the bacteria up on the pond side. They have been persuaded that adding high levels of the bacteria that they think they are culturing is how to gain the greatest benefit from their usage.

In typical production systems, which are open, many factors impact what is going on. Adding large numbers of bacteria species to ponds is not as straightforward as it seems. Moreover, it is not necessarily better. These are complex ecosystems that one is adding the bacteria to.

“The added bacteria are limited by the availability of nutrients and competition for them by the existing microbiome.”

There are bacterial viruses and a wide variety of antimicrobial substances, which in concert all act to limit the ability of these exogenous bacteria to grow.

Thus, the need to add them repeatedly. There is no data that supports the idea that more is necessarily better in your average pond. This, however, is but one aspect of the process. The vibrios that contain the specific plasmid and genes for the production of PirA and PirB thrive when there is little competition.

Blending molasses with seawater and culturing products that contain spores and many other nonspore forming bacteria (currently being offered to farmers as beneficial bacteria) without making sure that the Pir toxins are not present when this ferment is added ponds are the norm.

Why growing bacteria up pond side without professional oversight may be a biosecurity nightmare?

Many farmers are unwittingly adding AHPNS causing bacteria in their ponds via this route. While data show this is not readily available, my personal experience with growing bacteria up outdoors suggests that vibrios are common contaminants as well as the experience of others who have bothered to look.

While there may be some benefit from the other bacteria present, it is not worth the risk to the farmer, his family, and the industry as a whole.

This lack of control is a guarantee that AHPNS will continue to cause serious challenges to shrimp farmers everywhere.

“While it is possible that some tolerance, and perhaps eventually resistance may develop to these toxins, the damage that is occurring today and certain to continue into the near future is huge and being made worse.”

This approach to the addition of bacteria to the ponds belies the overall lack of understanding on the part of most farmers and elements of the supply chain about the risks. Furthermore, strains of VP are also pathogens of human beings.

It is grossly irresponsible to be taking an approach that as a result of its massive scale, ensures that there are selective pressures in place that can produce even more virulent strains, endangering the health of the farmers and those around them.

Growing bacteria is best left to professionals with the tools to ensure that cultures are not being routinely contaminated with bacteria that could harm the crop and potentially the farmers as well.

Ph.D. Stephen G. Newman

Stephen G. Newman has a bachelor’s degree from the University of Maryland in Conservation and Resource Management (ecology) and a Ph.D. from the University of Miami, in Marine Microbiology.
He has over 40 years of experience working within a range of topics and approaches on aquaculture such as water quality, animal health, biosecurity with special focus on shrimp and salmonids.
He founded Aquaintech in 1996 and continues to be CEO of this company to the present day.
It is heavily focused on providing consulting services around the world on microbial technologies and biosecurity issues.
sgnewm@aqua-in-tech.com
www.aqua-in-tech.com
www.bioremediationaquaculture.com
www.sustainablegreenaquaculture.com

WAS
CARGILL
Cargill Empyreal75
REEF
ISFNF
ISFNF
ISFNF
ISFNF
GLOBAL LEADERS

Leave a comment

Tu dirección de correo electrónico no será publicada. Los campos obligatorios están marcados con *